JWS Consulting is a division of Johnson Winter & Slattery providing commercial consulting services.
Johnson Winter & Slattery is engaged by major businesses, investment funds and government agencies as legal counsel on important transactions and disputes throughout Australia and surrounding regions.
Our firm provides a diverse range of opportunities for talented, enthusiastic people to develop brilliant legal careers.
Our news and media coverage including major transaction announcements, practitioner appointments and team expansions.
We support a number of community initiatives and not for profit organisations across Australia through pro bono legal work and charitable donations.
We support a number of organisations through sponsorships.
The Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Act 2020 (Cth) (the Act) and the Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Rules 2020 (Cth) (the Rules) enacts the JobKeeper scheme, one of key economic initiatives of the Commonwealth to address the broader economic effects of COVID-19.
In broad terms, businesses and not-for-profit organisations affected by COVID-19 will be able to access a subsidy from the Commonwealth to continue paying their employees. Affected employers will be able to claim a payment of A$1,500 per fortnight per eligible employee from 30 March 2020 until 27 September 2020. This article aims to provide a summary of the rules relating to the JobKeeper scheme.
What is the subsidy?
An entity will be entitled to the JobKeeper subsidy of A$1,500 for an eligible employee for a fortnight commencing on 30 March 2020 and each subsequent fortnight, ending with the fortnight ending on 27 September 2020 (each fortnight being a “JobKeeper fortnight”).
Entitlement to a JobKeeper payment
An employer is entitled to the JobKeeper payment for an individual for a fortnight if:
Who is not eligible?
An employer is not eligible for the JobKeeper payment if:
Concept of “eligible employee”
Employees will be assessed for eligibility for each relevant fortnight. An eligible employee is an individual who:
An employer cannot make a claim for employees who were not employees as at 1 March 2020 or who have been, or have agreed to be, nominated by another employer.
Long term casual employees are only eligible if they were employed on a regular and systematic basis for at least 12 months at 1 March 2020 and not a permanent employee of another employer.
The eligible employee must give to the employer a nomination notice in approved form outlining satisfaction of the above requirements and that they agree to be nominated by the employer for the purposes of the JobKeeper Scheme. An employee who is a long term casual must at the time of notice not also be a permanent employee of another employer.
The entity must have notified the Commissioner at or before the relevant time that the entity elects to participate in the JobKeeper scheme. The relevant time is, for:
The entity must have also given information about the entitlement for the fortnight, including details of the individual, to the Commissioner in the approved form. This is based on the employer receiving a nomination notice from the employee. Once doing so, the employer must notify an individual in writing within 7 days of having given the information to the Commissioner.
The Commissioner must make the JobKeeper payment for a fortnight no later than the later of:
Subsection 14(3) of the Rules provides a transitional rule that allows the Commissioner to make an advance payment for the JobKeeper fortnights ending in the month of April without being satisfied that the entity is entitled to that payment under either section 6 or section 11 of the Rules.
This is necessary to ensure that payments in respect of the first and second JobKeeper fortnights (being the fortnights commencing on 30 March 2020 and 13 April 2020 respectively) can be made quickly to assist entities affected by the Coronavirus.
However, before the Commissioner can make such an advance payment:
Decline in turnover
The employer must, in addition to carrying business in Australia on 1 March 2020, or being a non-profit body that pursued its objectives principally in Australia, have a decline in turnover.
An employer will satisfy the decline in turnover test if the employing entity has suffered a:
The decline in turnover test relies upon tests set out in Division 188 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) (GST Act). To determine if an entity has suffered a decline in turnover for JobKeeper purposes, the entity can compare:
An entity is free to choose whether it will calculate its projected decline in turnover on a monthly or quarterly basis – it is not limited by whether it files a monthly or quarterly Business Activity Statement. Note the turnover calculation is based on GST turnover, irrespective of whether the entity is registered for GST or not.
Once an entity determines that it can qualify for JobKeeper payments for a fortnight because its turnover has declined by the relevant amount, the entity remains eligible for JobKeeper payment and there is no need for that entity to keep testing turnover in the following months. That said, an entity which qualifies for JobKeeper will be required to report to the Commissioner, within 7 days of the end of the month, its GST turnover for the month and its projected GST turnover for the following month.
The decline in turnover thresholds is measured on an entity by entity basis and the GST group, if one exists, is disregarded for this purposes. However, the determination of which turnover threshold applies has regard to the “aggregated turnover”. This term includes annual turnover of the relevant entity, in addition to all the entities that are connected or affiliated with the entity being tested, subject to specific adjustments (for example, for transactions between the entity being tested and those other entities). These connected entities or affiliates may be based in Australia or overseas. Accordingly, many subsidiaries of foreign owned corporate groups will be required to demonstrate a 50% decline in its turnover.
The Commissioner also has the discretion to set out alternative tests that can establish an entity’s eligibility when turnover periods are not appropriately comparable. These alternative tests only need to be considered if an entity cannot establish it has satisfied the decline in turnover test described above. An entity which has demonstrated the necessary decline in turnover under the above test will not be rendered ineligible simply because it happens to fall outside of one or more of the alternative tests. .
As at the date of writing this article, the Commissioner has published alternative turnover tests covering 7 classes of businesses. It is only necessary to satisfy one of these tests. Broadly, the classes covered are entities which have:
The final class of business covered by these rules are sole traders or small partnerships with no employees that have had their turnover affected as a result of the sole trader or partner not working due to sickness, injury or leave.
In order to receive the JobKeeper payment for an individual for the relevant fortnight, the entity must satisfy the wage condition. The wage condition is satisfied in respect of an individual if that individual is paid an amount which equals or exceeds A$1,500. This amount may be calculated for the relevant fortnight inclusive of salary, wages, commission, bonus or allowances, certain amounts withheld by way of tax, contributions to super funds or amounts forming part of salary sacrifice arrangements.
It should be noted that employers who usually compensate their employers on basis which is longer than a fortnight will need to apply the wage condition allocated to a fortnight or fortnights in a reasonable manner.
Sole traders, a partner in a partnership, an adult beneficiary of a trust or and a director or shareholder of a company may be entitled to the JobKeeper Payment scheme under the business participation entitlement.
The subsidy is A$1,500 for an individual who is an eligible business participant for a fortnight commencing on 30 March 2020 and each subsequent fortnight, ending with the fortnight ending on 27 September 2020. With the exception of sole traders, it is the entity, and not the individual, that receives the payment.
Importantly, an entity is only entitled to claim JobKeeper in respect of one eligible business participant.
Entitlement to JobKeeper payment
An entity is entitled to a JobKeeper payment for an individual, and only one individual, for a fortnight if:
Concept of eligible business participant
The non-employee individual is an eligible business participant of an entity for the fortnight if the individual meets all of the following criteria:
As noted above, the measurement of turnover by reference to Division 188 of the GST Act results in some quirks as the definition of “current GST turnover” and “project GST turnover” as modified by the Rules exclude, among other things, input tax supplies under GST law. This will no doubt affect many employers in the financial services sector. In any event, use of term turnover does not taken into account the margin that particular products or services derive. For instance, a company could have two product lines – one with a very high margin, but comparatively lower sales and one with a lower margin, but higher sales. The loss of sales from the higher margin product may reduce profit by a greater extent that the decline in overall sales.
An additional point to note for corporate group that use an employing entity that on charges other members of the group is that the employing entity may not suffer a decline in turnover even though the corporate group as a whole has suffered a decline in turnover. The precise arrangements between members of a corporate group may need to be examined closely.
The JobKeeper payment is assessable income for a recipient of the JobKeeper payment. Nor is the JobKeeper payment consideration for supplies made by the recipient and as such GST is not payable in respect of the JobKeeper payment.
The Act requires that records be kept and maintained by entities who receive JobKeeper payments. This covers pre-payment and post-payment records. An entity can lose its entitlement to the JobKeeper payments if adequate records are not maintained.
Where an employee earns salary or wages of A$1,500 or more per fortnight, the JobKeeper payment will in substance be a reimbursement of part of the usual salary or wages paid to an employee. In this case, as the employee is receiving their normal salary or wages, superannuation guarantee obligations also continue to apply in the usual way.
However, where an employee has been stood down or otherwise earns less than A$1,500 per fortnight, the employer will be required to pay the employee an additional amount (i.e. top up) the salary or wages it pays to ensure the wage condition is satisfied; that is, the employer pays to the employee at least A$1,500 (gross) per fortnight. The Commonwealth Government has stated that it intends to make changes to the superannuation guarantee law to ensure that superannuation guarantee obligations do not apply to any additional amounts (which where an employee has been stood down could be the entire A$1,500) that an employer makes in order to satisfy the wage condition. For example, the changes will ensure that if an employee is paid A$1,000 per fortnight for the work they perform, superannuation guarantee will apply to this amount, but not the additional A$500 per fortnight required to be paid to the employee by JobKeeper. Of course, employers can voluntarily choose to make superannuation contributions in respect of these additional amounts.
The Act also contains a general anti-avoidance rule that is not dissimilar to Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth). In particular, the sole or dominant purpose test is used to deal with “contrived” schemes.
Be the first to receive the latest articles, news and publications.
Recently the Victorian State Revenue Office released guidance on its website on its interpretation of the economic entitlement provisions contained in the Duties Act 2000 (Vic).
Partners Andy Milidoni and Prashanth Kainthaje have written the Australian chapter for the eighth edition of Global Legal Insights: Corporate Tax 2020.
The High Court of Australia handed down its much awaited decision about personal leave entitlements in Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v AMWU & Ors and Minister for Jobs and Industrial Relations v AMWU ...