Electronic execution and online meetings – permanent reforms are on the way

Articles Written by John Keeves (Partner)

On 25 June 2021, Commonwealth Treasury issued an exposure draft of legislation to make permanent reforms to the Corporations Act in relation to electronic execution of documents and online meetings.

The exposure draft legislation is designed to make permanent the temporary measures contained in the Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No.1) Bill 2021 (TLAB) that as at the date of writing remains before the Senate.

The exposure draft (Treasury Laws Amendment (Measures for Consultation) Bill 2021) changes some of the policy settings in TLAB, in particular:

  • hybrid meetings (part in person and part online) will be facilitated;
  • virtual-only meetings will be facilitated only where the company’s constitution requires or permits virtual-only meetings – this is a key change from TLAB;
  • shareholders’ rights to ask questions or speak at meetings can be exercised either orally or in writing – meaning written only questions may be a thing of the past;
  • execution of documents by sole director companies will be facilitated
  • new rights will be conferred to allow an independent person to have oversight of a poll and/or provide an independent report on a poll on request by shareholders with at least 5%.

To reprise, when passed TLAB will:

  • facilitate giving notices of meetings electronically, including by sending a written communication with sufficient information to allow access of a notice electronically (for example a postcard with a hyperlink)
  • require companies to communicate with members to give them an option to receive hardcopy communications
  • facilitate electronic minutes including signing of minutes
  • facilitate electronic execution of documents by companies, including deeds.

It is hoped that both TLAB and the exposure draft legislation will be passed by the last sitting day in September 2021, in good time before the opening of the 2021 AGM season.

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

For more information, please contact

Related insights Read more insight

Committee report supports passage of Privacy Bill with amendments

This week marks a significant development in Australia’s privacy law reform process, which is likely to result in some changes becoming law before the next federal election.

More
Paying with scrip? Key considerations for junior ASX-listed mining companies

The past year has undoubtedly been challenging for companies in the lithium, rare earth and critical minerals sectors. To provide some context, lithium carbonate, lithium hydroxide and spodumene...

More
Do you need to disclose an ACCC investigation to comply with your continuous disclosure obligations?

Recent cases have highlighted whether an ASX-listed entity must make a market disclosure to the ASX if it receives a confidential compulsory investigation notice under section 155 of the...

More