In Carrello,[1] the Federal Court granted a warrant under section 530C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act) allowing the liquidator of Drilling Australia Pty Ltd (the Company) to search and seize property, books and records located in storage containers belonging to the Company.
The decision serves as a reminder to liquidators about the potential availability of warrants to search for and seize property, books and records when dealing with difficult directors.
The Company was placed in liquidation by order of the Supreme Court of Western Australia on the basis of a deadlock as to its control. Despite requests by the liquidator, the Company’s director failed to deliver up assets, books and information pertaining to the Company, and it became clear that there were assets of the Company unaccounted for.
The liquidator subsequently applied for an order pursuant to section 530C of the Act for the Court to issue a warrant authorising the liquidator to search and seize property, books and records of the Company located in certain identified storage containers and premises.
The Court firstly acknowledged that the section 530C warrant is ordinarily ‘a remedy of last resort’[2] and is typically granted where there has been a persistent pattern of non-cooperation and evasion.[3]
The issue of the requested warrant was authorised on the basis that the Court was satisfied that:
Liquidators should be mindful of their broad powers of search and seizure provided by section 530C of the Act when faced with uncooperative and evasive directors.
Although such warrants should be a last resort, it is common for the criteria to be satisfied if the liquidator is able to show their reasonable efforts to obtain the property, books and records, and the obstruction or evasive action taken by company officers preventing access. It is also useful to bear in mind that property does not need to be registered to a person's name or in their custody for them to be in possession of it; control over the property will suffice. [8]
[1] Carrello (Liquidator), in the matter of Drilling Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1563.
[2] [2019] FCA 1563, [6].
[3] [2019] FCA 1563, [7].
[4] Vartelas v Kyriakou [2009] FCA 1489, [6].
[5] Crisp, in the matter of Buchanan Group Holdings Pty Ltd v Iliopoulos [2011] FCA 1521, [11].
[6] Crisp, in the matter of Buchanan Group Holdings Pty Ltd v Iliopoulos [2011] FCA 1521, [13].
[7] See the definition of ‘possession’ in the Act by reference to s 86, which explains “A thing that is in a person's custody or under a person's control is in the person's possession.”
[8] Carrello (Liquidator), in the matter of Drilling Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) [2019] FCA 1563 at [9].
The High Court of Australia has upheld the New South Wales Court of Appeal decision that foreign state immunity extends to a national airline subject to a winding up proceeding. The High Court held...
We are delighted to share with you the next edition of our Insolvency & Restructuring Case Summaries. With over 45 case summaries highlighting the key takeaways and the practical implications for...
A recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Metal Manufacturers Pty Ltd trading as TLE Electrical v WesTrac Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 144 (WesTrac decision) has highlighted some of the...