Appeal rights under the new uniform Commercial Arbitration Law

Articles Written by Jessica Teoh (Associate), Joanne Staugas

This article discusses the appeal rights of parties under the new uniform commercial arbitration law with specific reference to the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (SA) which commenced operation on 1 January 2012 and is part of a wider legislative framework proposed for the uniform conduct of domestic commercial arbitration throughout Australia. Under the old commercial arbitration law, appeals to Courts could be made either with the agreement of the parties to the arbitration agreement or with permission of the Court. Under the new arbitration law an appeal can only be made if the parties 'opt in' and agree no later than 3 months from the making of the award to preserve appeal rights and obtain leave of the Court. Current arbitration agreements may require amendment to preserve parties' appeal rights.

The Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (SA) (the New Act) commenced operation on 1 January 2012 and is part of a wider procedural framework for the uniform conduct of domestic commercial arbitration throughout Australia.  Similar legislation has also been passed in:

  • New South Wales (commenced on 1 October 2010);
  • Victoria (commenced on 17 November 2011);
  • Northern Territory (yet to commence); and
  • Tasmania (yet to commence),

(together, the New Acts).

Bills are before Parliament in Queenslandand Western Australia. The Australian Capital Territory is yet to introduce a Commercial Arbitration Bill into Parliament. Before the commencement of the New Acts, domestic commercial arbitration was governed in each state by the old Commercial Arbitration Acts (Old Acts). The New Acts are fundamentally different to the Old Acts. Rather than being based on the UK arbitral law and system they are based on and supplement the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (UNCITRAL).

Under the Old Acts:

  • appeals to Courts could be made either with the agreement of the parties to the arbitration agreement or with permission of the Court; and
  • to effectively exclude appeal rights, parties had to enter into a separate agreement before the arbitrator entered on the reference.

Under section 34A of the New Acts, an appeal can only be made if the parties 'opt in' and agree no later than 3 months from the making of the award to preserve appeal rights and obtain leave of the Court. It is unlikely the successful party will agree to an appeal after the award and therefore it makes sense for the parties to agree by way of the arbitration agreement (usually included in the relevant contract) to 'opt in' and reserve appeal rights.

The New Acts are not retrospective. Two important issues arise for consideration.

Drafting arbitration clauses

Arbitration agreements should be either amended (if this is practical) or drafted on an 'opt in' basis to preserve the parties' right to appeal. Otherwise, the parties' recourse against arbitration awards will be limited to either obtaining agreement from the successful party within 3 months of the award, or when the following defects in the arbitration process exist:

  • failure to give proper notice of the arbitral proceedings or an inability of a party to present its case;
  • the arbitration was not in accordance with the arbitration agreement or the Act (e.g. was not fair or impartial; being the paramount objective of the Act);
  • a party was under some incapacity or the arbitration agreement is invalid;
  • the award deals with matters that do not fall within the terms of the submission to arbitration; or
  • the award conflicts with public policy (section 34).

There are a range of other 'opt in' and 'opt out' procedural matters dealt with under the New Acts where the parties can reserve jurisdiction to the courts. 

Arbitration disputes

Current arbitration agreements are unlikely to contain an 'opt in' agreement to reserve appeal rights. In relation to a dispute which is to be arbitrated, be aware that as a result of the change in law:

  1. an appeal can be made only with the agreement of the parties no later than 3 months from the making of the award and leave of the Court; and
  2. it might be wise to suggest to other parties to the dispute that all parties agree in writing to reserve their appeal rights before the arbitrator enters on the reference.

We are able to assist in drafting or amending arbitration clauses to ensure compliance with the New Acts to preserve appeal rights. Please contact us if you require our assistance.

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

Related insights Read more insight

Defamation Concerns Notice is a substantive requirement – WA case dismissed

The Supreme Court of Western Australia recently dismissed a defamation claim brought by a plaintiff who had not given a concerns notice before commencing the relevant proceedings. In dismissing the...

More
Forensic investigation reports: the question of privilege remains – Singtel Optus v Robertson

The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has dismissed an application made by Optus for leave to appeal the first instance decision by Justice Beach. In this article, we consider the key...

More
Vanguard pinged for greenwashing

In proceedings brought in the Federal Court of Australia, ASIC has successfully established that one of the world’s largest investment managers contravened the ASIC Act when it made a series of...

More