Thomas Cameron is a construction disputes lawyer with experience representing principals, contractors, engineers, certifiers, and architects in complex and high-value construction proceedings. He advises across the full range of contentious construction matters, with experience in both the UK and Australian markets, giving him a strong understanding of differing contractual frameworks, risk profiles and dispute resolution approaches.

Thomas regularly acts on disputes arising from major construction projects, including those in the renewable energy sector, providing strategic advice on dispute avoidance as well as early claim development through to formal dispute resolution, including litigation and other adversarial processes. He is known for his ability to analyse technically complex issues and translate them into clear, structured legal strategies that support his clients' commercial objectives.

Alongside his construction disputes practice, Thomas has significant experience acting for and against insurers on coverage and professional indemnity matters connected with construction projects. This dual perspective enables him to deliver commercially astute advice that aligns legal strategy with clients' risk-transfer arrangements, ensuring that outcomes are both legally robust and commercially effective.

Work highlights

New South Wales located Rail Project

Representing the O&M Contractor in relation to a significant range of construction issues.

Queensland located Wind Farm Project

Acting for a subcontractor in relation to a claim arising from misrepresentation and delays. 

North-West Rail Link

Defending more than 30 sub-claims by the principal arising out of delays, variations and alleged defects.

UK-based major developer

Defending multiple UK High Court claims (c. £90 m) concerning alleged defects in the design and construction of concrete frames to residential and mixed-use developments.

UK-based fit-out contractor

Advised a national contractor in responding to a high-value adjudication involving over 1,500 alleged construction defects, formulating defence strategy and evidence within compressed statutory timelines.