Directors take note: penalty notices to cover more company debts

Articles Written by Ben Renfrey (Partner)

On 5 July 2011, the Federal Government released the Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 7) Bill 2011: companies' non-compliance with PAYG withholding and superannuation guarantee obligations (the draft legislation). The draft legislation is designed to:

  1. better protect workers' entitlements to superannuation;
  2. strengthen director obligations; and
  3. enhance deterrence of fraudulent phoenix activity.

The draft legislation aims to achieve these objectives by:

  1. expanding the Director Penalty Notice (DPN) regime to incorporate unpaid superannuation guarantee amounts;
  2. enabling the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to commence recovery of an amount demanded under a DPN without providing the current 21 day grace period where the unpaid tax debt is overdue by more than 3 months; and
  3. restricting access to Pay As You Go (PAYG) withholding credits for company directors and their associates where the company has failed to pay withheld amounts to the ATO..

What are Director Penalty Notices?

Director Penalty Notices have been around since 1993 as part of the "trade off" for the loss of priority afforded the ATO prior to the 1993 amendments (which also established Part 5.3A dealing with administrators). The DPN provisions of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) give the ATO the power to collect outstanding PAYG taxes deducted from employee wages by making directors liable for a penalty in the same amount as the unpaid taxes if the company does not pass on those taxes to the ATO.

Under the current laws, the ATO may commence proceedings to recover the penalty from the directors 21 days after the DPN is issued. Currently, DPNs may only be issued in respect of unpaid PAYG withholding tax.

Defences to Director Penalty Notices

There are currently two principal defences available to a director issued with a DPN. First, the director may establish a defence by proving that it was unreasonable for the director to take part in the management of the company, and the director did not take part, during the relevant period in which the unpaid taxes were incurred due to illness or other good reason. Secondly, it is open to the director to prove that the director took all reasonable steps to make the company comply with its obligations to remit the unpaid tax to the ATO.

The draft legislation adds two additional defences, namely that a director will not be liable under a DPN where the director proves that he or she took all reasonable steps to cause an administrator to be appointed to the company, or to cause the company to be wound up.

Changes to the Director Penalty Notice Regime

The draft legislation extends the DPN regime to include unpaid superannuation guarantee charge (SGC) amounts. It also allows the ATO to commence recovery proceedings against a director without waiting 21 days from when the DPN is issued where the unpaid taxes (i.e. PAYG or SGC) are overdue by more than 3 months.

The draft legislation brings into legislation a commitment made by the Gillard Government in the lead up to the 2010 federal election, and was announced in the 2011-12 Budget. Accordingly, the Federal Government will be pressing to pass the legislation during the current parliament.

From the commencement of the amendments to the DPN regime directors will need to be extra vigilant that both PAYG and SGC taxes are remitted on time to the ATO to avoid personal liability for those unpaid amounts. Directors should also get advice on their obligations and particular circumstances early where there is a risk of PAYG or SGC liabilities not being paid on time.

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

Related insights Read more insight

Section 588FDA: indirect benefits to directors risk voiding a mortgage transaction

A recent Federal Court decision provides a useful distillation of the key principles that apply to unreasonable director-related transactions under s 588FDA of the Corporations Act.

JWS advises Brookfield on sale of Autocare to Optimus Group

Leading independent law firm Johnson Winter Slattery is advising Brookfield on the sale of certain businesses within LINX Cargo Care Group. As a part of that transaction, JWS is advising on the...

Voidable transactions: act within the statutory time limit

A Federal Court decision, handed down on Friday, is a blunt reminder that the statutory limitation period in section 588FF(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) needs to be adhered to strictly, and...