JWS Consulting is a division of Johnson Winter & Slattery providing commercial consulting services.
Johnson Winter & Slattery is engaged by major businesses, investment funds and government agencies as legal counsel on important transactions and disputes throughout Australia and surrounding regions.
Our firm provides a diverse range of opportunities for talented, enthusiastic people to develop brilliant legal careers.
Our news and media coverage including major transaction announcements, practitioner appointments and team expansions.
We support a number of community initiatives and not for profit organisations across Australia through pro bono legal work and charitable donations.
We support a number of organisations through sponsorships.
On 5 July 2011, the Federal Government released the Tax Laws Amendment (2011 Measures No. 7) Bill 2011: companies' non-compliance with PAYG withholding and superannuation guarantee obligations (the draft legislation). The draft legislation is designed to:
The draft legislation aims to achieve these objectives by:
Director Penalty Notices have been around since 1993 as part of the "trade off" for the loss of priority afforded the ATO prior to the 1993 amendments (which also established Part 5.3A dealing with administrators). The DPN provisions of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) give the ATO the power to collect outstanding PAYG taxes deducted from employee wages by making directors liable for a penalty in the same amount as the unpaid taxes if the company does not pass on those taxes to the ATO.
Under the current laws, the ATO may commence proceedings to recover the penalty from the directors 21 days after the DPN is issued. Currently, DPNs may only be issued in respect of unpaid PAYG withholding tax.
There are currently two principal defences available to a director issued with a DPN. First, the director may establish a defence by proving that it was unreasonable for the director to take part in the management of the company, and the director did not take part, during the relevant period in which the unpaid taxes were incurred due to illness or other good reason. Secondly, it is open to the director to prove that the director took all reasonable steps to make the company comply with its obligations to remit the unpaid tax to the ATO.
The draft legislation adds two additional defences, namely that a director will not be liable under a DPN where the director proves that he or she took all reasonable steps to cause an administrator to be appointed to the company, or to cause the company to be wound up.
The draft legislation extends the DPN regime to include unpaid superannuation guarantee charge (SGC) amounts. It also allows the ATO to commence recovery proceedings against a director without waiting 21 days from when the DPN is issued where the unpaid taxes (i.e. PAYG or SGC) are overdue by more than 3 months.
The draft legislation brings into legislation a commitment made by the Gillard Government in the lead up to the 2010 federal election, and was announced in the 2011-12 Budget. Accordingly, the Federal Government will be pressing to pass the legislation during the current parliament.
From the commencement of the amendments to the DPN regime directors will need to be extra vigilant that both PAYG and SGC taxes are remitted on time to the ATO to avoid personal liability for those unpaid amounts. Directors should also get advice on their obligations and particular circumstances early where there is a risk of PAYG or SGC liabilities not being paid on time.
Be the first to receive the latest articles, news and publications.
As part of our most recent Australian Foreign Investment Update, our investment funds specialists highlight the recent, main regulatory developments that are likely to be of interest to offshore...
With mounting pressure from the regulator and the burden of administrative costs, super funds are making the decision to merge more often than before; at least 28 have taken the step since 2014.
Do your call centres and complaints divisions know what they can and cannot say under the Australian Consumer Law?