Queensland Government introduces further mine rehabilitation reforms

Articles Written by Stuart Clague (Partner), Samantha Daly (Partner), Lara Douvartzidis (Associate)

Recent amendments to the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (Qld) (EP Act) further reform the mine rehabilitation regime in Queensland.

The reforms:

  • establish a new independent statutory officeholder called the Rehabilitation Commissioner; and
  • seek to enhance the residual risk framework for the management of resource sites after an environmental authority for a resource activity has been surrendered.

Rehabilitation Commissioner

The Rehabilitation Commissioner will provide independent scientific advice to both government and industry for the purpose of evaluating the rehabilitation framework in Queensland.

The statutory functions of the Rehabilitation Commissioner include:

  • providing advice to the Minister on:
    • rehabilitation and management practices, outcomes and policies; and
    • the public interest evaluation processes for “non-use management areas” (which are areas of land that cannot be rehabilitated to a stable condition following the completion of resource activities on the land);
  • developing technical and evidence-based reports on complex aspects related to the rehabilitation of land or best practice management of non-use management areas;
  • monitoring, and providing reports to the Minister on, rehabilitation performance and trends;
  • consulting on, and raising awareness of, rehabilitation and management matters;
  • chairing workshops and forums about technical, scientific or engagement matters.

The Rehabilitation Commissioner has an advisory role rather than a regulatory function.  The administering authority under the EP Act will continue to regulate resource activities through the approval of environmental authorities and the taking of enforcement action.

Amendments to residual risk framework

Over recent years, the EP Act has been amended to include a residual risk framework that seeks to ensure that risks remaining on a resource site following completion of resource activities are identified, costed and managed.

The reforms seek to enhance the existing residual risk framework in an endeavour to improve the management of residual risks on former resource sites.

The reforms to the residual risks framework:

  • require a post-surrender management report to accompany an environmental authority surrender application for a resource activity which (amongst other matters) includes:
  • a risk assessment that complies with the residual risk assessment guidelines to be published by the State Government; and
  • if the risk assessment identifies residual risks, a risk management plan for managing the former resources site following surrender of the environmental authority (and which includes the estimated costs and expenses associated with carrying out ongoing management activities and remedial actions calculated in accordance with the residual risk assessment guidelines).
  • provide that residual risk payments may be collected for both rehabilitated areas and non-use management areas and may only be required after a surrender application has been made;
  • establish a residual risks fund under the Mineral and Energy Resources (Financial Provisioning) Act 2018 (Qld) (MERFP) in which all residual risk payments made under the EP Act will be pooled and financially managed by the Scheme Manager under MERFP; and
  • require residual risks to be noted on the relevant land title where a risk management plan exists.

On 2 October 2020, the Queensland Department of Environment and Science (DES) published an Interim Residual Risk Assessment Guideline for the purpose of describing how to undertake a residual risk assessment and providing information to help determine whether a risk management plan is required to be included with a post-surrender management plan.  DES have stated that the Interim Guideline will be in place until the completion of the final residual risk assessment guideline under the Ministerial Industry Implementation Working Group.

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

Related insights Read more insight

Digital Bytes – cyber, privacy & data update

Welcome to Digital Bytes, our latest quarterly update on current developments in cyber, privacy and data governance.

Scheme or non-scheme? Australian Energy Regulator’s review of gas pipeline regulation

The Australian Energy Regulator will review the form of regulation – a ‘scheme’ or ‘non-scheme’ – of gas pipelines around Australia (excluding Western Australia). The outcome of a review has the...

JWS appoints Isaac Evans, further deepening the firm’s corporate advisory, M&A, ECM and PE expertise

Leading independent Australian law firm Johnson Winter Slattery (JWS) has appointed Isaac Evans as a Special Counsel in its Corporate team. Isaac is based in Brisbane and joins JWS from Baker...