Pre-feasibility study on Bowen Basin Pipeline – Queensland Government

Articles Written by Tom Barrett (Senior Associate), Haerim Nam (Associate)

On 20 August 2020, the Queensland Government announced that it will invest $5 million towards a pre-feasibility study of a potential new gas pipeline from the Bowen Basin in central Queensland as part of its broader recovery plan from COVID-19. The Queensland Government will seek a further $5 million in matched funding from the Commonwealth Government for the study.

The study, which is forecast to take approximately 12 months to complete, will examine the feasibility of, and options for, a new 500km transmission pipeline to connect gas reserves in the Bowen Basin to the east coast domestic market and overseas customers. It is proposed that the study will analyse gas prospectivity and sources of fugitive emissions in the area, seek to identify opportunities for industry involvement in the development of the pipeline and determine the best route for the pipeline.

The Queensland Government’s announcement did not give any indication of whether the proposed pipeline might connect to existing infrastructure.

In the announcement, the Queensland Government projected that the pipeline project could create more than 1000 jobs during the construction phase and further jobs in the operational phase.

On 21 August 2020, Small Caps reported that ASX-listed Blue Energy “stands ready to assist” with the study. The emerging gas player noted in its Quarterly Activities Report dated 30 April 2020 that it had recommended the Commonwealth and Queensland Governments initiate what it described as the “Bowen Basin southern gas pipeline project” – the construction of a 500km multi-user pipeline from Moranbah to Gladstone or Wallumbilla. That recommendation followed commencement of Blue Energy’s own pre-feasibility study on a fast-start gas fired power generation plant to be located in the Bowen Basin and which would be aimed at providing peaking electricity generation and frequency and inertia services.

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

Related insights Read more insight

Russian sanctions: supervening illegality and impact on contracts with Russian interests

In the first case of its kind in Australia, the Federal Court of Australia held that Rio Tinto-backed Queensland Alumina Ltd was correct in interpreting and applying the sanctions imposed by the...

What is a “right to mine” and what is an “infrastructure facility” in the Native Title Act?

The High Court has delivered its decision in Harvey v Minister for Primary Industries and Resources [2024] HCA 1.

Mandatory climate-related financial disclosure – exposure draft legislation released for comment

Treasury has released an exposure draft of its CRFD legislation for public comment. This is the next step towards introducing mandatory and standardised CRFD for medium and large listed and...