ACCC grants urgent interim authorisation to Coles

Articles Written by Aldo Nicotra (Chairman), Sar Katdare (Partner)

Last week the ACCC granted an urgent interim authorisation to Coles to coordinate its activities with other supermarkets for the broad purpose of ensuring the fair and equitable distribution of retail products to consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authorisation allows parties to engage in conduct that would otherwise contravene competition law on the basis that the public benefits of the conduct outweigh the public detriments.

 

What does the authorisation allow the supermarkets to do?

Subject to each party filing a similar application, the authorisation will allow supermarkets to discuss, enter or implement any arrangement or engage in any conduct for the purpose of:

  • Facilitating or ensuring the acquisition or supply of retail products, especially those in short supply;
  • Ensuring fairer access to retail products among the general public;
  • Providing greater access to retail products for those most in need; and
  • Facilitating access to retail products in remote or rural areas.

The authorisation will also allow supermarkets to agree upon arrangements with manufacturers, suppliers and transport & logistics providers.  The authorisation however will not allow the supermarkets to agree on retail prices or service levels. 

The authorisation will be in force for 6 months unless revoked by the ACCC on an earlier date and the conduct that is the subject of the authorisation is not compulsory for supermarkets.

 

What is the impact on suppliers?

We anticipate that the authorisation will be beneficial for suppliers in that it will seek to maximise the supply and distribution of products across Australia in an efficient manner at a time when demand is higher than usual.

We expect to see supermarkets seeking better wholesale prices from suppliers while at the same time not running as many or as deep promotions.

Suppliers however, are not compelled to agree to any arrangements or conduct put to them by the supermarkets.  In addition, the usual provisions of competition and consumer laws will continue to apply including the operation of the Food and Grocery Code. 

The ACCC will also soon be seeking feedback on the supermarket authorisation.

 

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

Related insights Read more insight

Anti-competitive disparagement: think twice before you criticise your competitors’ products

The European Commission recently fined a large global pharmaceutical company €462.6 million for abusing its dominant position to lessen competition in the market for the supply of Copaxone...

More
Do you need to disclose an ACCC investigation to comply with your continuous disclosure obligations?

Recent cases have highlighted whether an ASX-listed entity must make a market disclosure to the ASX if it receives a confidential compulsory investigation notice under section 155 of the...

More
Preliminary discovery – the neat trick that allows you to obtain another party's documents

In recent years, several cases have involved a party seeking preliminary discovery against another party to determine whether to commence proceedings against that party for conduct that breaches...

More