The new GST withholding regime for New Residential Premises and Potential Residential Land

Articles Written by Andy Milidoni (Partner)

With effect from 1 July 2018, a new withholding regime for GST will require purchasers to withhold an amount from the purchase price for ‘new residential premises’ and for ‘potential residential land’ where the supply of those types of land is a taxable supply made by the vendor. This is the first instance, outside the reverse-charge rules under the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (the GST Act), where the recipient of a taxable supply has an obligation to remit the GST payable on a taxable supply to the Australian Taxation Office.

The new regime was legislated by Schedule 5 of Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Measures No. 1) Act 2018 (the TLAA). This amends Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) by inserting new sections 14-250 and 14-255 and subject to the transitional rules as set out below.

This, in addition to the CGT withholding regime for non-residents, has introduced additional challenges for tax advisors and conveyances alike when advising and acting for purchasers and vendors in real property transactions covered by the regime.

The article below examines the key features of the new regime and how this will affect the drafting of the contract of sale.

Important Disclaimer: The material contained in this article is comment of a general nature only and is not and nor is it intended to be advice on any specific professional matter. In that the effectiveness or accuracy of any professional advice depends upon the particular circumstances of each case, neither the firm nor any individual author accepts any responsibility whatsoever for any acts or omissions resulting from reliance upon the content of any articles. Before acting on the basis of any material contained in this publication, we recommend that you consult your professional adviser. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation (Australia-wide except in Tasmania).

Related insights Read more insight

Commissioner’s embedded royalty hunt diverted

The Full Federal Court has handed down its much-anticipated decision in PepsiCo, Inc v Commissioner of Taxation [2024] FCAFC 86, overturning the decision of the Federal Court.

More
State and territory budget snapshot – key business announcements

More
JWS advises MM Capital Partners on acquisition of interests in Australian PPP projects

Leading independent law firm Johnson Winter Slattery (JWS) has advised MM Capital Partnerson the successful acquisition by its latest fund, MM Capital Infrastructure Fund II, L.P., of 50 per cent...

More