The introduction of legislation creating a stay on enforcement of ipso facto clauses was reported in our September 2017 article. However, the devil was always going to be in the detail, and in particular the type of rights and contracts excluded from the operation of the new law.
On 16 April 2018 Treasury released exposure drafts (which can be accessed here) of the Corporations Amendment (Stay on Enforcing Certain Rights) Regulations 2018 (Regulations) and the Corporations (Stay on Enforcing Certain Rights) Declaration 2018 (Declaration). The Regulations relate to contracts, agreements or arrangements. The Declaration relates to kinds of rights. Each set out significant and wide ranging exclusions from the stay.
In our view, the proposed Regulations and Declaration outline commercially sensible exclusions from the operation of the stay. (Please note that there are in excess of 30 types of contracts, agreements, arrangements and 10 kinds of rights which are excluded).
For example, the proposed Regulation 5.3A.50(2)(h) excludes from the stay an agreement for the sale of all or part of a business. That is, the vendor or purchaser which is not insolvent remains entitled to terminate the sale agreement. In our view, this is sensible. The approach taken to this particular exclusion promotes the aim of the reform (while sensibly seeking to avoid unintended consequences). This attitude appears to have been adopted to all of the proposed carve outs, save that there will be the inevitable uncertainty, in some cases, about whether or not the contract, agreement, arrangement or right is one falling into these excluded categories.
Other categories of contracts, agreements and arrangements that will not be subject to the ipso facto stay include:
The kinds of rights that will not be subject to the ipso facto stay include:
The right to appoint a controller will also be excluded from the stay where certain circumstances are satisfied. This proposed carve-out recognises that contractual arrangements between parties as to the priority of secured creditors in insolvency events and the exercise of rights should not be disturbed, and prevents an outcome which promotes a race between creditors to appoint a controller.
The exposure drafts appear to have taken a commercially sensible approach to the proposed exclusions from the ipso facto stay. This approach provides breathing room for viable but financially distressed or insolvent companies by allowing continued operations (that is, prohibiting certain counterparties from seeking to terminate or hold the relevant entity “to ransom”) while the underlying business is restructured or sold for value, ultimately for the benefit of creditors.
It is anticipated following the consultation period ending on 11 May 2018 that the stay, the Regulations and Declaration will commence on 1 July 2018.
Be the first to receive the latest articles, news and publications.
A recent Federal Court decision provides a useful distillation of the key principles that apply to unreasonable director-related transactions under s 588FDA of the Corporations Act.
A Federal Court decision, handed down on Friday, is a blunt reminder that the statutory limitation period in section 588FF(3) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) needs to be adhered to strictly, and...
In this decision, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of NSW considered the interplay between the priority regimes under ss 556 and 561 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) in resolving a...