In September 2008, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission issued Regulatory Guide 46 Unlisted property schemes: Improving disclosure for retail investors. RG 46 set out 8 disclosure principles which ASIC considered issuers of unlisted property schemes should disclose against (in product disclosure statements and on an ongoing basis) to help retail investors understand the risks associated with unlisted property schemes.
Following a review by ASIC of PDSs for unlisted property schemes and a consultation process in late 2011, ASIC released on 28 March 2012 an updated version of RG 46. The revised RG 46 includes updates to the eight disclosure principles and requires product issuers to disclose against six new benchmarks on an 'if not, why not' basis - consistent with ASIC's increasing use of benchmark disclosure (for example, as currently used for debentures, agri schemes, mortgage schemes and infrastructure entities).
Importantly, the revised disclosure principles make it clear that ASIC considers that the key terms of a scheme's financing, including loan-to-valuation and interest cover covenants (in addition to interest rate and hedging details) must be disclosed in the PDS and updated on an ongoing basis.
ASIC expects the industry to comply with the new disclosure principles and disclosure benchmarks from 1 November 2012. ASIC states in RG 46 that, in relation to any PDSs that pre-date 1 November and are still in-use at that time, the issuer generally can rely on Class Order 03/237 and place disclosure on the issuer's website rather than in supplementary or replacement PDS.
RG 46 sets out 6 new disclosure benchmarks that issuers should disclose against on an 'if not, why not' basis; that is, if the scheme does not comply with the benchmark, the PDS should explain why not. The six benchmarks are:
(a) a valuer to:
(i) be registered or licensed in the relevant state, territory or overseas jurisdiction in which the property is located (where a registration or licensing regime exists), or otherwise be a member of an appropriate professional body in that jurisdiction; and
(ii) be independent;
(b) procedures to be followed for dealing with any conflicts of interest;
(c) rotation and diversity of valuers;
(d) valuations to be obtained in accordance with a set timetable; and
(e) for each property, an independent valuation to be obtained:
(i) before the property is purchased:
(A) for a development property, on an 'as is' and 'as if complete' basis; and
(B) for all other property, on an 'as is' basis; and
(ii) within two months after the directors form a view that there is a likelihood that there has been a material change in the value of the property.
ASIC considers that if the responsible entity meets this benchmark, the PDS should disclose a summary of the valuation policy, that the scheme currently complies with this policy and where an investor can obtain a copy of the full valuation policy.
If the responsible entity does not meet any of these benchmarks, the PDS should explain why not and disclose the risks associated with the approach that the responsible entity has adopted. In the case of the Distribution practices benchmark, the sources of funds the responsible entity intends to use to meet distributions (and the risks of using such sources) must also be disclosed.
The original RG 46 included eight disclosure principles which set out matters which ASIC considered responsible entities should provide disclosure on both in the PDS for the scheme and in ongoing disclosure to scheme members. The disclosure principles covered, amongst other things, matters such as disclosure of gearing ratios and interest cover rations and details about scheme borrowings, portfolio diversification and distribution practices.
The updated RG 46 provides more detailed guidance in relation to 7 of the original disclosure principles, removes the eighth original disclosure principle and replaces it with a new one. Accordingly, pursuant to the updated RG 46, the matters described below (in addition to the guidance in the original RG 46 that continues to apply) should be addressed when making disclosure in accordance with the eight revised disclosure principles.
ASIC recognises, however, that in some circumstances, applying a disclosure principle to a particular unlisted property scheme may be likely to mislead investors or otherwise be clearly inappropriate. In those circumstances, the disclosure should not be made, however, ASIC considers that the responsible entity should disclose that the information has been omitted and explain why it would be misleading or inappropriate to include the information. Responsible entities should also consider whether they can disclose other information to help investors assess the relevant risk factor.
1. Gearing ratio: In relation to the gearing ratio disclosure, responsible entities should now also:
2. Interest cover ratio: In relation to the interest cover ratio disclosure, responsible entities should now also:
3. Scheme borrowings: In relation to disclosure about the scheme's borrowings, responsible entities should now also disclose:
4. Portfolio Diversification: In relation to disclosure about the scheme's portfolio diversification and its development assets, responsible entities should now also:
RG 46 goes on to explain ASIC's view of what constitutes a development asset and how to determine whether 20% or more of a scheme's property assets are in 'development'. In summary, ASIC's view is that development is the construction of a new building, significant increases in the lettable area of a building, or significant changes to the nature or use of a property. Refurbishment of existing assets is not development for the purposes of RG 46. When determining whether over 20% of the property assets of the scheme are development assets, ASIC considers that, when making this calculation, the developed portion of an existing individual asset that is not entirely developed should not be included.
5. Related party transactions: In relation to disclosure about the responsible entity's related party transactions in relation to the scheme, responsible entities should now focus their disclosure on describing related party arrangements relevant to a member's (or potential member's) investment decision. The description should address in relation to each arrangement:
ASIC notes in RG 46 that the above disclosure should however not be made to the extent that it may confuse investors by dealing with inconsequential matters, or to the extent that investors already have adequate information about the related party transactions as a result of past disclosures.
6. Distribution practices: In relation to disclosure about the scheme's distribution practices, responsible entities should now also disclose, where the scheme is making or forecasts making distributions:
7. Withdrawal arrangements: In relation to disclosure about investors' right to withdraw from a scheme, responsible entities should now also disclose:
8. Net tangible assets: RG 46 includes a new disclosure principle relating to a scheme's net tangible assets. Responsible entities of closed-end schemes should now disclose the value of the net tangible assets of the scheme on a per unit basis in pre-tax dollars. This new disclosure principle was not suggested by ASIC in its initial consultation, however has been adopted by ASIC in response to public submissions which suggested it should be included. The NTA of the scheme should be calculated using the following formula:
NTA = Net assets - intangible assets +/- an other adjustments
Number of units in the scheme on issue
RG 46 provides that the NTA should be based on the scheme's latest financial statements. If it is not, the date and source of the information used should be disclosed. If a different formula is used, the responsible entity should disclose the different formula and explain why it has chosen a different method of calculation.
NTA calculations should be made in accordance with applicable accounting standards and the ASIC/APRA unit pricing policy (RG 94).
RG 46 provides that disclosure against the six benchmarks and the eight disclosure principles should be made in the product disclosure statement for the scheme and in ongoing disclosures.
In relation to ongoing disclosures, ASIC considers that it is good practice for responsible entities to update investors on the status of benchmark and disclosure principle information at least every six months. These updates should include confirmation that there have been no material changes, or an overview of the material changes to the disclosure if there have been any. In any case, ASIC expects responsible entities to provide investors with notice of any material change to a matter, or a significant event that affects a matter, in accordance with the obligations under either Chapter 6CA or section 1017B of the Corporations Act.
(a) New PDS issued from 1 November 2012 - ASIC expects that new PDSs dated 1 November 2012 or later should disclose against the benchmarks and disclosure principles.
(b) PDS dated pre-1 November 2012 and still in use - ASIC states in RG 46 that any PDSs that pre-date 1 November 2012 and are still in-use at 1 November 2012 time can make use of Class Order 03/237 and place disclosure on the issuer's website rather than in a supplementary or replacement PDS. This must be done by 1 November 2012. Of course, issuers could choose to issue a replacement or supplementary PDS (for example where they were not otherwise able to comply with the conditions of Class Order 03/237).
(c) Existing schemes - disclosure outside the PDS regime - For existing schemes, ASIC expects responsible entities to provide investors with an update of the benchmark and disclosure principle information by 1 November 2012. This may be done through the responsible entity's normal investor communication channels (such as regular investor updates or by including the information on a website that is used to communicate with investors).
ASIC has also updated RG 46 to provide guidance on making a PDS clear, concise and effective. RG 46 states that a PDS will generally be clear, concise and effective if it:
ASIC also encourages the use of 'consumer friendly tools' such as tables, diagrams and other comparative features.
RG 46 explains that, as part of clear, concise and effective disclosure, ASIC considers that a PDS should include an investment overview within the first few pages of the PDS. The investment overview should be an introduction to the responsible entity and the offer and should:
ASIC's push for the inclusion of an investment overview section would not be something that is new to regular issuers of product disclosure statements and is consistent with ASIC's revised disclosure principles in relation to prospectuses.
The updates to RG 46, including the introduction of the new benchmark disclosure, is another example of ASIC moving toward seeking to prescribe the content of product disclosure statements, despite the Corporations Act adopting general disclosure tests. However, despite any views that a responsible entity may have of the new disclosure expectations, ASIC has noted in RG 46 that it will be reviewing in-use product disclosure statements and ongoing scheme disclosure to check that adequate disclosure has been made against the benchmarks and disclosure principles.
Responsible entities of unlisted property schemes should now be turning their mind to the likely content of their disclosure against the benchmarks and disclosure principles (whether or not they have a PDS in-use) in order to meet the 1 November 2012 deadline.
Be the first to receive the latest articles, news and publications.
Treasury has released an exposure draft of its CRFD legislation for public comment. This is the next step towards introducing mandatory and standardised CRFD for medium and large listed and...
This short Q&A explains what is in the 12 January 2024 exposure draft legislation.
In August, the Commonwealth commenced formal consultation on its review of the regulatory framework governing Australian managed investment schemes (MISs).